Lisa's Blog

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

The book synopsis -- what it is and what it isn't

For those of you ready to start submitting your work to agents, today is the start of kind of a mini book synopsis writing seminar. Today is what a synopsis is and isn't. Then tomorrow through Saturday, I'll post the synops that I wrote for Magic Lost Trouble Found, Armed & Magical, and The Trouble With Demons.

For those of you who haven't read one of more of those books yet, avert your eyes -- needless to say, a synop is chock full of spoilers. In fact, it's nothing buy spoilers. I know I learn better by reading an example, and I think it might help some things click for you writers out there if you read a synop of a book that you've actually read that also won over a publisher. Hope it helps.

For me, coming up with a plot for a book and writing a synopsis isn't quite the same thing, but one leads to the other by necessity. (Editors like to see before they buy.) I'm highly organized and methodical -- my writing brain is the exact opposite (kinda like Felix and Oscar for you fans of classic TV). Books come to me in snippets of dialogue, pieces of scenes, chunks of chapters. I know there's a book in there somewhere, but it's up to me to lay all the puzzle pieces out then put them together to find out what the final picture looks like.

Some writers swear by having a synposis to go by, some swear at it. These writers get an idea, love the idea, and jump into the idea with both feet. They don't want to plot anything out or write a synopsis first. It's all about the journey and the joy of discovery. Writing anything down before starting would ruin it.

What a synopsis is not -- A synopsis is not every bit of action that will go into your book. It's the "40,000 feet/big picture" view. You include only the main plot points. A book synopsis should ideally cover the book from beginning to end (but only the main points), introduce only your main characters, and be written in the tone of your book. My synopsis for TTWD was in first person, Raine's point of view (just like the books), and it is also in present tense. It gives the action a more immediate impact. Immediate impact is good for drawing an agent into your story.

But when you're first starting to write your synopsis, feel free to include anything and everything you want to. That way you've got something to work with (and to whittle down). By having everything together in one document, you can see the big picture and begin to weed out the stuff you really don't need to include, and come up with other really cool stuff. Chances are it will start off looking like a convoluted mess (mine do). As you edit, delete, add, refine, tweak -- the synopsis will start to take shape (and most importantly, so will your plot).

Most agents start off wanting a query letter with a one paragraph synopsis (I'll cover how I wrote my query letters in a future series of posts). If they like what they read, they'll request sample chapters. Some agents will also want to see a synopsis at this point before asking for the entire manuscript. All agents are different; Kristin Nelson (my agent) didn't want to see a synopsis of Magic Lost, Trouble Found. She prefers to read the full manuscript without knowing what's going to happen, to get a more authentic reader reaction.

When your agent is marketing your book to publishers, they will want a synopsis. And once you're published and trying for that next contract, your publisher will most likely want a synopsis and the first 50 pages of the book before they decide to make your agent an offer. writing the synopsis is unavoidable. Sorry to have to be the bearer of bad news.

Once you have a polished version, some writers stick to it like glue. I don't. At least not entirely. While I'm writing, a lot of the time I'll come up with something even better. Believe me, my editor did not mind -- and yours won't either.

Starting tomorrow through Saturday, I'll post my synops for Magic Lost, Trouble Found, Armed & Magical, and The Trouble With Demons.

6 Comments:

Anonymous http://www.katie-lovett.com said...

"Some writers swear by having a synposis to go by, some swear at it."

LOL. I'm definitely one of those writers who swears at it. I've tried it both ways, and I just can't do the synopsis first. Now, once the first draft is done, I can write a synopsis, but writing it before just stifles my enthusiasm for the story for some reason.

March 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM  
Anonymous superwench83 said...

Aw, crap. I typed my URL in the the name box. Maybe I shouldn't have given up coffe for Lent...

March 10, 2010 at 9:01 AM  
Anonymous Stephen Dead said...

Personal impression is that it's far more important to capture the tone of your book than the actual plot. I've done out-and-out trailers, character sketches plus the set-up and I've done plot summaries, and the one thing that never got me a book deal was summaries. Also, for inspiration on how to write a synopsis to make it sound exciting to an editor, go read the blurbs on the back of the books he or she had published. Likely as not they wrote the blurb and it's there fir the sole purpose of making you buy the book. You might cringe, sometimes, but thus us what that editor thinks works. Write your synopsis like that and you know you're appealing to their tastes!

March 10, 2010 at 9:28 AM  
Anonymous Chicory said...

Glad to know editors don't expect you to stick to your synopsis if you're writing on spec. That's something that's been worrying me a bit. (Not that I'm anywhere near that point.)

March 10, 2010 at 9:45 AM  
Blogger K.C. Shaw said...

I'm about to start writing a synopsis, and boy do I dread it. I find it harder to write than the book itself. I'll keep this post in mind while I work--it's so easy to get bogged down in details, and I always forget that a synopsis can be revised after I screw it up. :)

I'm looking forward to reading your examples this week! Thanks!

March 10, 2010 at 10:08 AM  
Blogger Lisa Shearin said...

Great point, Stephen! (reading blurbs on the backs of books that they've edited).

And, yes, tone is critical in a synop.

March 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home